Heck it's possible they will be using Silverlight 2.
#Have silverlight installed but not working safari plus#
Plus we don't know it they will use the Silverlight.js that works or the one that doesn't. It would not be nice if those videos did not work in the recently released FF3 come this August. But with the NBC Olympic site set to use Silverlight for their videos. Changing the UA string to a Firefox UA string instead of a Minefield UA string makes no difference. Jonas who can dig deeper into this? The bottom line is why does using the object tag work in FF2 and not FF3? The embed tag works in both.
Also is the plugin returning false in that case from IsVersionSupported or is the function call failing and returning false? Or would that throw an exception if the IsVersionSupported function call failed? But why is the IsVersionSupported returning false when not stepping through the IsInstalled function and returning true when stepping through the function? That's the strangest part. I encountered no exceptions when stepping through the IsInstalled function. So I assume that the IsVersionSupported function return is the reason IsInstalled returns false. But that only happens when I step into the isInstalled function with Firebug. But when I try to step through with Firebug it returns true and the plugin gets loaded but the xaml file is not loaded so the area on the page for the plugin ends up as a white block which uses the silverlight context menu. In the failing case it seems like it returns false. They both call IsVersionSupported on the plugin with 1.0 as the in parameter. The one that works tests loading the plugin with an embed. The difference that seems to count here between the silverlight.js files is the isInstalled function. It was easy enough to use as a visual studio user.
Ok I dove into this some more by trying Firebug(1.1b12) for the first time.
0 kommentar(er)
